|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
Whatever happended to the revolution?
|
by LES EVERETT Fremantle Herald
THE talk around town last week was that the long awaited Crawford "constitutional
review of the West Australian Football Commission" was going to hit the local
footy world hard.
Some thought WAFC boss Jeff Ovens would lose his job, or at
least a couple of fingers. But tough talk doesn't appear to be Crawford's style.
Football in WA has been, he said, "administered pretty well." He also put an end
to thoughts of revolutionary change by stating: "It is important to recognise at
the outset that the major stakeholders were unanimous in their view that there is
a need for the continuation of an independent and strong commission that is
capable of acting in the interests of football in Western Australia and not be,
or be seen to be, responsible to or aligned with any factional group or groups."
However there was a sting in the tail.
Crawford raised issues of accountability
and the need for greater democracy. His suggested a house of representatives
system for election of commissioners with the current commissioners having 20% of
the votes; Fremantle 20%; West Coast 20%; the WAFL 30%; the Metropolitan Football
League 5% and the WA Country Football League 5%.
While the recognition of
grassroots football has great appeal there are sure to sticking points. The WAFL
clubs have gone from having a 100% say in the running of the game not so long ago
to 50% under the current structure to 30% under Crawford's recommendation. There
will be some interesting discussions on this point in the weeks to come with
questions as to whether the current commissioners should be getting a vote sure
to be raised.
Another interesting statement from Crawford concerns the
relationship between the WAFC and the AFL clubs: "Whilst it cannot be denied
that the Commission is the legal owner of those AFL clubs, the support that
enables those clubs to survive comes from the membership who turn up and pay to
watch and support their teams..."
Crawford suggests the board of the Dockers
should have 10 members, eight to be elected by the current board and two by the
members. The member elected board members would increase to four over the next
four years.
Although supporting the WAFC ownership of the AFL clubs Crawford has
recommended more independence for them and an end to "any day to day interference
from the Commission". The WAFC would only step in if the Eagles or Dockers were
not operating within their budgets or business plans.
Under the present
arrangements, Crawford said the AFL clubs had little or no incentive to maximise
their profits. To address this he's suggested the AFL clubs pay a fixed amount
annually to the WAFC rather than the present royalty and facility fee.
Also of
interest to Dockers supporters is the recommendation that the FFC board of
directors be abolished. You'll recall it was the presence of this board that
caused the trouble during the Damian Drum dismissal.
The message for the WAFC
from Crawford's investigations is that it did a job that was needed but now the
time has come for change. The ball is now in its court and its maturity is about
to be tested.
|
|
|