|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
Game theory
|
by RICK KANE
LATE in the season last year, Daniel Bradshaw, an
AFL footballer, made the decision to be with his partner at the birth of their
child rather than play in a semi final for his club. That is, he chose one team
over the other.
What makes this issue fascinating to contemplate is the fact that he plays
football at an elite level, at a time when the corporatisation of footy has,
seemingly, become its overwhelming influence. Concurrently, male/female
relations, I would argue, are evolving into more complex, respectful and,
probably, mature levels.
For the individuals involved, this decision has to be unbearably personal and
weighty. The reflection the decision casts, the media reaction and an appraisal
of what that suggests can inform us on the state of play of what we value. In a
perverse way, this incident can be read as an indicator of the times.
I might be way out of whack with contemporary thinking, but I was surprised and
encouraged by somebody having the guts to make such a courageous decision. The
courage pales compared to childbirth, OK - just so you don't infer a misguided
perspective - but nonetheless, in a male stronghold, I call it lion-hearted.
Bradshaw's coach at Brisbane, Leigh Matthews all but endorsed the player's
decision, making somewhat of a Descartian observation that individuals must be
true to themselves. He expressed this point-of-view on Talking Footy. It didn't
seem to correlate with the stereotyped assumption regarding what Australian men
value. This especially, because it came from a legendary, hard, rugged, committed
footballer. And with the potential prize of a premiership on the near horizon for
all that that is worth. He then speculated, again seeming to break the mould of
what we might imagine to be the Aussie bloke collective worldview, that these
decisions are done as a couple. As a team.
Media commentators were not all so enlightened. On Talking Footy this issue did
not develop into a discourse on the meaning of football to our lives. Or even to
discuss the impact of such a decision in a corporate structure. In that sense,
perhaps the program might be called Superficially Talking Footy.
Commentators elsewhere were even lees considered. On Triple M several
commentators, who, it must be added, have a vested interest in the current
developments of the game, provided opinion that was lacking in generosity,
lateral ability and insight. Skills that you might hope anyone close to the
rudder possess, let alone display. While not denigrating the decision, the
general consensus was that Bradshaw owed some allegiance and responsibility to
his team and his team-mates. And, I might add, metaphorically, to the game.
It is here that the clash between values espoused by the sporting contest can be
contrasted against the significance and wonder of birth. Using the hyperbole
associated with sport (facetiously) I will appraise the decision.
Football is often described using war/battle imagery. Commentators talk of a
struggle to the death, of a player killing an opponent, of a game not being over
until the dying moments. Well childbirth is about life and death in ways football
can only pretend to be. A relatively straightforward labour can at any moment,
for inexplicable reasons, suddenly become complicated. The equivalent on the
football field might be Hird doing a hamstring five minutes into the last
quarter. Hird is not going to die and the worst that can happen to the team is
that they lose. Ouch.
During labour the partner is the least needed person, in practical terms. He will
never be the lynch pin to a successful outcome. But he is a part of the team. For
males, particularly males in positions of power or influence, it can be a
humbling experience. His presence is largely symbolic and mainly in a support
role.
But if I ever had to give birth I reckon the least I would expect of the partner
would be to witness the unbelievable pain and agony, to connect with the tumult
of emotion surging through my mind and to do every stupid little thing I asked.
As a male who has witnessed labour/childbirth (both caesarean and vaginal) I find
it impossible to draw a comparison.
When a game of footy is compared, in serious
terms, it begs the question, what is valued more, life or kicking the pigskin
around?
|
australianrules.com.au
|
|