|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
Let's stand for parliament
|
by DAMO SUZIKI
MY maiden speech was going to be a pearler, the
best yet. It was going to cover the state of the nation - from health care to
the VFL to power limits for motorbikes. It was 1983.
I had been put up
as a candidate by the APTU - Australian Postal & Telecommunications Union (mail
sorter division) and won a seat courtesy of preferences from Syd Negus ''No
Probate" party.
Never worked out what probate meant.
I had
typed a 47 page speech and had it proof read by the finest minds on the mailroom
floor and in the attic of APTU headquarters in Stirling Street. It named the
usual suspects before they were the usual suspects; tobacco companies; the
unrestrained forces of global capital; Lang Hancock; Phil Oakey; Norm Gallagher;
the big end of town; christians; the AMA, and dozens of others. But the real
venom of course was reserved for the state of football. "Fairly shocking, madame
deputy chair", I wrote, "nothin' short of a total ream out will fix that lot". I
suggested the formation of an ALoF (Australian League of Football) the board of
which (if indeed there would be a 'board') was to be directly elected by the
football going public. None of this collegiate nonsense.
God help me, I
was only 32.
When I got to my feet in the house I looked straight into
the eyes of the big man himself, John.
Now these days Fraser has been
rehabilitated somewhat in the public eye, becoming a darling of the soft left,
but we here at this site remember him as the man who made promise breaking a
regular and expected part of political life.
So, he fixed me with that baleful
stare of his, reminiscent it is said of the that of Charles 'Sonny' Liston. I
became flustered and dropped my notes and they scattered over the floor. I had
to wing it. "Madame deputy chair", I addressed the speaker, "there is a
monstrous blight facing this great land of hours, and his name is Malcolm".
Fraser looked like he didn't know whether to be perplexed or pissed off. I
though it rather a clever little joke in the circumstances, alas the voters
didn't think so one year later.
Now we are in a very similar situation
to 1983, why there is even a 'John Howard' in the current government. There will
be a change of government but I'm not sure that there is any party or candidate
willing to stand up for what is needed.
Les Everett is the man for the times but
he has an extensive criminal background that, if it came out, might derail his
chances (though there is a school of thought that it would enhance his
prospects).
What we need is a string of like-minded candidates, and in
these days of preferences going all over the place, one only needs a small
percentage of the vote, particularly in the senate. I propose that we use this
site to come up with a common platform, and I will offer the first suggestion -
scrap the push in the back rule. Suggestions welcome.
Editor's note:
Interesting thoughts Damo but you need to watch a bit more football. The push in
the back rule has gone the way the drop kick.
|
|
|