|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
Observations from the North/Footscray game
|
by RICK KANE
ON Thursday's 'Footy Show' Trev Marmalade made a
crack about Joe Gutnick. It was something about Joe having to give up another
position at Melbourne FC - his seat in the cheer squad to an eight year-old. Trev
is a funny, astute and incisive comic (and about the only thing bearable on that
cockcomparingfeast of a show) and that particular gag was amusing in a
superficial sort of way. Interestingly, Greg Miller, the head of North Melbourne,
the team Trev barracks for passionately, was seen sitting with North Melbourne's
cheer squad last Friday night when they played Footscray.
I say 'seen' not because I actually was there and saw him myself. Channel 7
'spotted' the dear fellow down in the crowd, in the mob, mixing it up with yer
average, ordinary, grass roots, true blue supporters. Then Channel 7, by way of
their boundary rider, the Great Dipper, was able to interview him up close and
personal, with all his Roo mates. Makes the heart flutter to see the top man of a
football club elbow to elbow with us riff-raff. Makes 'em seem decent and real.
The stress, by the way, is on 'seem'.
I wouldn't, for a second, suggest that Greg Miller doesn't actually do this every
week. It just that, as far as I can recall, when I consider club head-honchos
sitting in with their cheer squad, only one comes readily to mind, that being Joe
'of the people' Gutnick. Now, with the appropriation of Joe's 'cheer squad thang'
happening hot on the heels of his, (how can I put this delicately) um, well,
public crucifixion, a painful analogy comes all too easily to mind. Okay, the
analogy is trite; nonetheless it does draw attention to a crudeness of intention
and action prevalent in the workings and maintenance of this game by its
designated custodians.
While I'm on about the Friday match between Norths and Footscray, what is it with
Carey the Scary and leaving one boot on while on crutches? After half time he
came hobbling out, one foot bandaged, one boot still on. Did he reckon he was
still half a chance to play? Was the strapper's attention diverted, as they were
busy removing the first boot, to conversations about who would be voted out of
the Big Brother house and they simply forgot to remove his other boot? Is it a
fashion statement? Are boots more comfortable than slippers? And what's with the
crutches? Where, godamnit, was his little buggy? Hell if old buggers are afforded
the right to hoot around in them surely one could be provided for the King. Also,
with a buggy, there is another opportunity for advertising. Come on guys, think
outside the crutch, or the square, as the case may be.
A footnote (heh,heh,heh) to that game. For the first time that I can remember
soccer booted footy off the main sports page of the Saturday Age. This is in
Melbourne remember! Seems Australia beating France in the round ball game is
considered more relevant to more Victorians than North Melbourne beating
Footscray in God's own game. Is this the thin edge of the wedge?
|
australianrules.com.au
|
|