|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
Two tribes
|
by LITTLE BOY BLUE
AT two o'clock last Saturday afternoon, the
Brisbane line-up looked pretty impressive, at least to this notoriously
pessimistic Carlton supporter. The names were all familiar and there didn't seem
a dud among them. Three hours later, it was hard to pick a player in the Brisbane
colours who hadn't played like a dud.
Obviously, Brisbane don't travel that well, but the game served to remind me that
there are essentially two groups in the AFL: those teams with a realistic chance
of ever winning a premiership and who play to that end, and the rest.
Brisbane, having promised much and delivered little in recent years, are making a
good case to be included in the latter. And, if it's true that lack of a home
town football culture adds to the problems, then Sydney are likely to stay as
success-deprived as the Lions.
Mind you, it is equally clear that a number of Victorian teams are there just to
make up the (excessive) numbers. Do Geelong or Bulldogs supporters really think
at the start of the season that they have any chance of winning the flag? If so,
I'll have a kilo of what they're on. As for St Kilda supporters, they had their
fluke of a chance a few years ago: sorry folks, that's it for another 100 years.
Did the St Kilda moron abusing Craig Bradley recently realise that Bradley has
played in twice as many premierships as the whole St Kilda club? Isn't that
embarrassing, you hack?
Essentially, we have a number of clubs whose supporters expect premiership
success and whose coaches are appointed and unappointed on that basis. Then, we
have the rest whose supporters go along for a nice social outing, meet their
equally deprived friends and go home. Their coaches survive if they win a few
games, raise some expectations and convince their boards that finishing third for
a few years is success.
This can't go on. I propose two possible solutions. The first is to divide the
clubs into two divisions. The first would comprise clubs with the culture and
modern history which make a premiership a realistic aspiration. The second are
the rest. Thus, the divisions would be:
Division A: Adelaide, Carlton, Collingwood, Essendon, Hawthorn, Port Adelaide,
Kangaroos, West Coast.
Division B: Brisbane, Fremantle, Geelong, Melbourne, Richmond, St Kilda, Sydney,
Western Bulldogs.
OK, Collingwood was a line ball choice, but I needed an eighth team, and
Fremantle's place in B is dependent on not merging with Peel Thunder: otherwise,
they start a new C division. Top team in A plays top team in B in the grand final
and maybe one day, just maybe, a dud team could win a flag.
The other solution to this two tribes problem is to cull the weaker tribe.
Accordingly, I propose the Subiaco solution. Dear old Subi went 49 years without
a flag, but finally cracked it in year 50. Any team which cannot win a flag at
least every 50 years has got to go. So, sorry Brisbane and Sydney, if you really
are the "successors-at-law" to Fitzroy and South Melbourne respectively, you're
gone. And Doggies, start preparing that last run-through for 2004!
|
australianrules.com.au
|
|