|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
It's the size of your balls that counts
|
by BRETT WOODWARD
I FIRMLY believe that I was sacked from my job
as a boundary umpire for being TOO fair.
I had become highly respected for my ability to see both sides in any disputed
call and was fully prepared to revise a decision if new evidence came to light
rather than be too proud and stubborn. You tell me, what's wrong with that?
OK, to clarify, I was a teenager forced to get up early on a Saturday morning for
high school matches.
After I lazily raised an arm or two (I never got the hang of those signals) I
would randomly award free kicks, demand that players be sent off, dish out on the
spot fines and match suspensions and use the word "whatever" way too much for a
supposed umpire of any stripe. I was drunk with power and, possibly, the previous
night's consumption of Hannan's Draught.
In addition, whenever I was required to throw the ball back into play I would
often be facing the wrong direction, would fall over or just drop it behind me
and walk away to roll a smoke. Too often I would be jeered, retreating to the
sidelines to calls of, "Didn't you get your Weeties this morning?!"
I never understood that particular insult. Were they honestly concerned that I
should enjoy a breakfast cereal rich in niacin, riboflavin, iron and fibre so as
to have a firm and regular stool? Shouldn't they have been more concerned with
the score than my bowel movements?
A few months of such behaviour and the end result was that my services as a
boundary umpire were no longer required.
By today's child psychology reckoning, such a rejection could have scarred me for
life. I could have become withdrawn and suffered from any number of emotional
problems. I did. I withdrew to the Piccadilly Hotel where frustration and rage
took hold every time I had to wait for a refill. I blame underaged drinking on
football - oh, and a number of publicans with a soft spot in their hearts and
wallets for teen drunks.
This wasn't the first time football had pushed me from its bosom. In primary
school my prodigious talents on the field inevitably resulted in me being
relegated to playing wing. Given that even the most disciplined young boy has
difficulty staying in his allocated position and not simply running blindly after
the ball, no one really noticed that I seldom stayed on the wing. In fact I had
usually strayed far enough to leave the field altogether, get changed and go
home. I blame wagging school on football.
Years passed and my lack of interest in football (the rejections you see, the
rejections) drew more than passing stares and whispers. Friends finally convinced
me to go with them to watch a game. I stalled for as long as possible, gave in
during a weak moment and fronted up. I was not enthralled by the match as there
are apparently no close-ups, replays or slow-mo at the actual game, even at a
so-called professional level.
Hey, and don't get me started on the catering. It becomes evident that sausage,
as has long been rumoured, is chiefly comprised of lips and arseholes once you've
tucked into a footy hot dog. When they barred BYO bevies from the grounds there
was just no reason for me to keep up the charade. Our nation is weaker for a game
that can't supply a decent feed and shuns a fan's god-given right to select,
chill and transport his own frosties. I blame football for the decline in great
Australian values.
I moved to Melbourne which, from an impartial observer's point of view, is most
definitely the football capital of this proud land. A nasty groin rash that is
dogging a valuable player will bump economic collapse, fire, flood, earthquake or
Papal sex scandal from the front page of the papers. Here I can hide from footy
fandom because Melbourne is, in more general terms, the sporting capital of
Australia with room for people of every nation and all their ball-games.
When someone at a bus-stop strikes up a conversation about the Pies piss-poor
performance, I can point out that I don't follow football and they immediately
assume that my passion must be the Slovenian Lacrosse League, the Portuguese
Bocce finals or, at a stretch, an imminent international curling showdown. I call
it hiding in plain sight.
It took years of contemplation and a long hard look at what other sports had to
offer before it hit me like 140-proof grappa: the problem with football is the
size of the ball!
Well, maybe the size of the ball and a few other refinements, but let's start
with the ball. How about something the size of a golf ball and painted green?
It would be easier on the players and inspire more crowd participation if the
game involved a lot more LOOKING FOR THE BALL.
Imagine a packed MCG chanting in unison, "Cold, cold, cold, warm, warm, cold
again, cold, warm, hot, hot, HOT!!!" while the players scrabble about on all
fours digging into the grass.
I'm prepared to compromise on a reduction in size but if it's to get larger, I
want it a LOT larger. How about three metres high with a clown's face painted on
it.
Once more, the delight of the crowd is fundamental to this strategy. Watching a
few dozen athletes, in peak physical condition, fall about trying to maneuver a
ball the size of a truck toward a goal with only centimetres clearance either
side is sure as hell going to take your mind off cold hot-dogs and warm beer in
plastic cups!
This is only the beginning. In order to retain its vigour modern football must
move with the times, keep in tune with what current fans want and consider
strategies that will attract new fans. Why no cameras in the change rooms and
showers after the match, Big Brother style?
Why not vote players off instead of simply sending them to the bench? How about a
Walk of Shame? Keep games going for six or eight weeks in remote locations.
Other amendments could be a return to the very origins of the game. Anything
wrong with 150 players a side and play ranging across entire suburbs with
passersby joining in if the mood takes them?
Eventually football will have to give the people what they want. If those weak,
spineless bean-counters who make up the league bureaucracy don't have the nuts to
introduce big cats (the kind that like Rhino sandwiches, not the kind that hail
from Geelong) into the game, some young entrepreneur is going to pull the rug
from under them!
Aussie Rules has always been a gladiatorial sport that has denied fans a coliseum
pay-off. Putting half the team on motorcycles and the other half on roller blades
is a nice first step. No penalties, no time limit and a freeing up of rules on
striking would help spice up an otherwise dull Saturday afternoon. As would the
introduction of firearms.
Football rejected me but I believe I'm still the bigger man. I've devoted
considerable time and resources to rethinking the game and offering some helpful
suggestions. I'd like to think that football could give them the once over and
ponder the possibilities. If not, there's always ice hockey, oooh, and I do like
that women's beach volleyball.
What about Foxy Boxing, very underrated.
|
|
|