|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
Trade talkin'
|
by CAMERON PALMER
AFTER this season's trade week it is evident that there has to be a change to the
current system. This season turned into a farce with no trades for the first
three and a half days, talk of blackmail, ransom, deceit, siege and breaking the
rules. Neil Balme afterwards said that there needed to be a change to the current
system. Balme is right, the AFL trade week needs to be updated and changed.
The biggest problem with the system is the AFL's strict policy on squad
numbers and contracts. Unlike in America, where the trade is successful in the
NHL, NBA and the NFL, a squad must be set for a season and no player can be
picked up after the pre-season draft. In America trading runs for the majority of
the season and this works as it gives teams time to make deals, it gives teams
time to get their salary cap in order and it gives teams time to see who they
still do and do not want. The biggest anomaly with this rule in the AFL on squads
is that players can still be de-listed during a season therefore players can be
left out of the game as was the case with Matthew Capuano this year.
Another problem with the AFL's trading period is the allowance for teams
to go into a pre-season draft.
In America rather than having a draft with
all left over out of contract players they are put on a free agent list with the
team with the most money left to pick up the player.
One final problem of
the AFL's trade week is that it takes place before teams have finalised their
rosters. Rather than having it once teams know the standing of every player they
have it prior. This wastes the time of trade week, as was the case with Dean
Solomon. His mind was not made up and for two days the entire trading period was
held up because a teams squad had not been decided.
The AFL has improved
the competition with the introduction of a draft but now it is time to move with
the times and improve the system. A new and improved draft would see:
1.
Each club producing a list of players who are out of contract and a squad list
prior to the national AFL draft. After this point no out of contract player may
be signed on with the club from the previous season.
2. The national AFL
draft takes place in November, however players are only eligible to be picked if
they have yet to have been on an AFL squad or were not part of an AFL squad in
the season prior. Therefore out of contract players remain with their club of the
previous season and are not able to be drafted.
3. The trading period
takes place following the draft with each side knowing who is under contract and
who is out of contract. The trading period should also be extended to a
fortnight. Players under contract are still able to be traded as is the case with
the current system such but this is the first opportunity that clubs have to pick
up out of contract players. If a team wishes to exchange draft picks in order to
gain a player the pick will be deemed to be for next year's draft. for example
Bulldogs round one pick rather than 'pick four'.
4. Following this trade
period all out of contract players and any player who was not picked in the AFL
draft are put on a free agent list which is where any club can pick up any player
by making a deal with just the player himself. A player may only go to a club if
he chooses to himself. The free agent list stays open for the entire season and
players can be de-listed to the free agent list throughout the year and players
can be picked up from the free agent list at any time during the season. Any
player on the free agent list at the end of the season is eligible to go into the
following season's draft.
This system would eradicate all the problems
with the current one especially those experienced this season. In the case of
Jade Rawlings the Bulldogs would not have been able to bend the system to gain a
player in the pre-season draft, as there would be no pre-season draft. Hence if
Hawthorn could not get a deal for Rawlings he would become a free agent and
therefore could go to his club of choice (Kangaroos) at a price negotiated by
himself, not by his ex-club.
The same goes for Nick Stevens. Port tried
to prevent Collingwood from picking Stevens up but knowing that if they could not
trade him they would lose him to the club of the highest bidding (which would
probably have been Collingwood) they may be more inclined to make a trade.
In the case of Dean Solomon where he was unsure the trading period would
not be held up as all teams would know who is out of contract and who is not.
When trading for draft picks this new system means a lot of luck plays a
part as a team will not know whether they are trading for a good pick or a poor
pick. By extending time it also allows for teams to get all deals done and with
two weeks there is less chance of a team missing out on a player by a few
minutes. It also allows teams and players who have a falling out to be put on a
free agent list and hence find more opportunities during the season.
This
new system would be more dynamic. It would make for more excitement and would
make trading period more cut-throat. More importantly however it would tidy up
the problems of the past and make it more efficient and easier to
understand.
|
australianrules.com.au
|
|