|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
A tribute to Grant Thomas
|
by MICHAEL STEVEN
IT was in the first game of the year that Matthews showed his team was in
decline. Excitedly he banged the desk and screamed into the phone when his
players physically attacked the ball and the opposition. His players responded to
the decree of Leigh. Like feral dogs, Mal Michael and Chris Scott savaged a
maimed Reiwoldt while he grimaced with an obvious injury. Darwinism as a theory
was in full force.
There have been stages throughout the year where
Brisbane has shown its previous superiority. Occasional glimpses only, however.
Matthews decided to throw Brown into the middle, a strategy applauded by
the commentators who have never coached and been subjected to the confines of
list management. He put his biggest and most dangerous weapon into the centre of
fire. Unused to failure Matthews alone knew the plight he was in. He will not
take prisoners, evidenced by his coat hanger attack on Barry Cable and his
encounter with Neville Bruns so many tears ago but, as he laughed on national TV
about the short-term success, you knew that it was a resolution of physical
intimidation rather than any real strategy. It was an act of desperation. It
failed.
A full footy year has passed since the ugliness of the first
round encounter between Brisbane and St Kilda. Michael and Scott are no longer
physically intimidating. Their pack is inferior to the best and their role is now
much less relevant. The bigger you are the harder you fall.
Intelligent
design is not within the power of Matthews, Demetriou or any other power hungry
animal, including the public face of the crumbling PBL. Demetriou, a mere
metaphor of the current debate about Australian values, has shown himself to be
unwilling to accept such a hypothesis. He insists on a homogenised voice. It is
not profitable to be willing to speak your mind. You will be crunched with a
Chris Scott-like jumper punch or something more sinister if you dare to expose
the schoolyard bully or challenge the existing power base. Freedom of speech is
OK but only as long as authority can go about its business unrestrained by
criticism when it gets it wrong.
St Kilda's dignified demolition of
Brisbane last Friday could probably teach our cricket captain about how to
confront adversity and even our Prime Minister about how to overcome the threat
of illegal violent attack. Grant Thomas is different and maybe that is why so
many people don't like him. But decency on the football field was restored last
Friday night in response to the first round violence and despite the edicts of a
dictatorial governing body.
Perhaps there is hope for Australian values
after all.
|
australianrules.com.au
|
|