|
|
home
letters & comments
footy
cricket
reviews
books
film & tv
music
food
travel
other arts
email the editor
footy links
> footypedia
> dockerland
> fullpointsfooty
> realfooty
> wafl clubs
cricket links
> baggygreen
archive
> 2008
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
|
|
What is slow?
|
by BEN STANWIX
IDEAS don't take long to become received wisdom in
footy, no matter how bonkers they are.
My least favourite at the moment
concerns Fremantle's midfield. In essence, so the story goes, the midfield is
slow - too slow to be a finals contender, let alone a premiership threat.
This from a contributor to esteemed fan site dockerland.com: "They are all slow,
short and workman-like - can run hard to contests but can't win clearances! We
need a player/players who can turn this weakness around."
The allure of
this argument will be obvious to anyone who regularly sat in the stands through
2005. A lot of Fremantle jumpers chased a lot of opposition ones without
appearing to catch very many.
It is, nonetheless, complete
rubbish.
Certainly Fremantle's midfield is not especially quick, but this
lack of speed is not the reason behind the midfield's poor showing this season.
The popular misnomer that it is all about speed comes largely from the rather
uncomfortable rise of the mob down the road. West Coast came less than a goal
from the premiership this year largely on the strength of a glittering midfield -
a midfield that is very fast.
Trouble is, Dockers fans who are screaming
for the club to draft, trade or genetically engineer a purple speedster are
selling the Eagles‰ midfield very short. They are, curse them all, more than just
fast.
Each is skilled, hard at the ball, well-drilled and dangerous in
front of goal.
But most importantly, with the exception of Adelaide
recruit Tyson Stenglein - traded to the club at the end of last year - every
player in the Eagles' midfield has played their entire career at West Coast. The
most recent to debut was Chris Judd in 2002. He‰s been playing and training
alongside Ben Cousins (1996), Michael Braun (1997) Chad Fletcher (1999), Andrew
Embley (1999), Daniel Kerr (2001) and Dean Cox (2001) his entire career.
Compare this to Fremantle. Last year it added Josh Carr, Heath Black and Jarrad
Schofield to the midfield. In 2003 it added Des Headland, Byron Schammer and
Aaron Sandilands. They joined Peter Bell (2001), Matthew Carr (2001), Troy Cook
(2000) and Paul Hasleby (2000). Justin Longmuir debuted for the Dockers in 1999
but has only moved onto the ball full time in the last couple of years. Black,
Schofield, both Carr brothers, Headland, Bell and Cook all came from other
clubs.
Here are two theories. One, to win the Dockers need to add another
player to this midfield mix who will bring the speed the side is currently
lacking.
Two, to win the Dockers need to string several seasons together
with the same talented midfielders playing alongside each other.
If you
think a good midfield is mostly about speed, the first theory is probably the
best one. In fact, you could also chuck out slower players like Bell, Hasleby,
Cook and Josh Carr and instead use quicks already on the list such as Jeff
Farmer, James Walker, Roger Hayden and Luke McPharlin through the middle.
But if you think a good midfield is more about chemistry, understanding and
playing for team mates, the second theory looks a lot more promising. Personally
I prefer the second one, and I hope it's the one Fremantle persist with in the
coming years.
From the Fremantle Rooster.
|
GET 'IM OFF - Paul Hasleby is part of a Fremantle midfield many supporters believe is too slow to win a premiership,
despite the players' considerable talent. Photo by Les Everett
|
|